- Major Transport Infrastructure Projects and Regional
Economic Development - Assessment and Implementation
Paris, 1-2 December 2011
-
The evolution of
London’s Crossrail Scheme and the development of the Department for Transport’s
economic appraisal methods
Slides: Appraisal Practice; The Crossrail Approach
Tom WORSLEY, Institute for Transport Studies (ITS), University of Leeds, United Kingdom
-
The ‘Grand Paris’ Project: Tools and Challenges

Slides: Le Grand Paris : quels outils quels
enjeux ?
André DE PALMA, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Cachan, France -
Le réseau de transport public du Grand Paris
-
Slides
Jean-Claude
Prager, Société du Grand Paris -
Maintained Hypotheses and Questions in
Search of Answers -
Slides
Prof Marc Gaudry, Université de Montréal, Canada and
Prof. Emile Quinet, Ecole des Pont ParisTech (ENPC) -
Transport infrastructure and economic growth
-
Slides
Dr Tim Leunig, London School of Economics -
Transport infrastructure
and the economics of cities -
Slides
Diego Puga, IMDEA Social Sciences
Brief summary:
40 of the world’s leading
researchers and practitioners discussed the
challenges of gauging the socio-economic costs and
benefits of very large investments in transport
networks. The issues are of perennial interest to
researchers and decision-makers, but have become
highly topical in the current macroeconomic
environment which highlights trade-offs between the
need to save and to maintain economies’ potential to
grow.
Participants concluded
that good operational tools exist to get a view on
the benefits of better transport options, even if
the improvements constitute a significant departure
from prevailing conditions, as in the case of
Crossrail in London, for example. The
understanding of wider impacts of transport on the
economy, including productivity and growth effects,
is improving as well, allowing judgment on when such
effects are likely to be significant and when they
are not.
Appraisal of projects
that aspire considerable change in the way regional
economies function, including for example the
Greater Paris public transport project, poses
formidable challenges, however. The reason is
that effects will take very long to emerge and that
they are dependent on a range of accompanying –
non-transport – measures. This means that
uncertainty is at the heart of the analysis.
Transport project appraisal then is only part of a
broader evaluation effort that should aim to
maximise the probability that envisaged benefits are
realised.
- Insurance and Road Crash Risks
Paris, 22-23 September 2011
- The Role of the Regulator in the Policy Process
Paris, 2-3 December 2010
- Improving the Practice of Cost-Benefit Analysis in Transport
Mexico, 21-22 October 2010
- Stimulating Low-Carbon Vehicle Technologies
Paris, 18-19 February 2010
-
Why the New Market for New Passenger Cars Generally Undervalues Fuel Economy --
Slides
David GREENE, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Transportation Research Center, USA
Discussion Paper 2010-6
-
Combinations of Instruments to Achieve Low-Carbon Vehicle-Miles
-- Slides
Don FULLERTON and Daniel H. KARNEY, University of Illinois, Champaign, USA
Discussion Paper 2010-7
-
The Impact of Economic Instruments on the Auto Industry and the Consequences of Fragmenting
Markets - Focus on the EU Case --
Slides
Luc BASTARD, Renault and CCFA, France
Discussion Paper 2010-8
-
The Demand for and the Supply of Fuel Efficiency in Models of Industrial Organisation
-- Slides
Johannes VAN BIESEBROECK, K.U. Leuven, Belgium and NBER and CEPR
Discussion Paper 2010-9
-
Incentives for CO2 Emissions Reductions in Motor Vehicle Taxes
--
Slides
Nils Axel BRAATHEN, OECD, Environment Directorate
-
Summary and Conclusions
- Implementing Congestion Charging
Paris, 4-5 February 2010
-
The Singapore experience: The evolution of technologies, costs and benefits, and lessons learnt
-- Slides
Kian-Keong CHIN, Land Transport Authority, Singapore
Discussion Paper 2010-1
-
Road pricing with complications --
Slides
Mogens FOSGERAU, DTU Transport, Denmark & Centre for Transport Studies, Sweden and Kurt VAN DENDER,
OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre
Discussion Paper 2010-2
-
Critical Success Factors for Implementing Road Charging Systems --
Slides
Bernhard OEHRY, Rapp Trans AG, Base, Switzerland
Discussion Paper 2010-3
-
So you’re considering introducing congestion charging?
Here’s what you need to know: An FAQ based on Stockholm’s experiences --
Slides
Jonas ELIASSON, CTS, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Discussion Paper 2010-4
-
Revisiting the Cost of the Stockholm Congestion Charging System.
Carl HAMILTON, CTS, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden
Discussion Paper 2010-5
- Road Pricing in the Netherlands: Overview --
Slides
Monique VAN WORTEL, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Netherlands
-
Summary and Conclusions
- Integration and Competition between Transport and Logistics Businesses
Paris, 5-6 February 2009
-
Introduction by the Chairman
Russell W. PITTMAN, U.S. Department of Justice, USA
-
Market Power and Vertical and Horizontal Integration in the
Maritime Shipping and Port Industry
Eddy Van de VOORDE and Thierry VANELSLANDER, University of Antwerp, Belgium
-
Empirical Evidence for Integration and Disintegration of Maritime Shipping,
Port and Logistics Activities
Antoine FREMONT, INRETS, France
-
Railroad Industry Structure and Competition
Marc IVALDI, Toulouse School of Economics, France
-
Railway and Ports Organization in the Republic of South Africa
and Turkey: The Integrator's Paradise?
Lou THOMPSON, Thompson, Galenson & Associates, USA
-
Are Horizontal Mergers and Vertical Integration a Problem?
Simon PILSBURY and Andrew MEANEY, Managing Consultants
- Summary and Conclusions
- Security, Risk Perception and Cost-Benefit Analysis
Paris, 11-12 December 2008
-
Security and Risk-Based Models in Shipping and Ports: Review and Critical Analysis
-- Slides
Khalid BICHOU, Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College London
Discussion Paper 2008-20
-
Rational Behaviour, Risk Aversion - High Stakes for Society
André de PALMA, ENS, Cachan, France
Discussion Paper 2008-21
-
Economic Impact Analysis of Terrorism Events: Recent Methodological Advances and
Findings --
Slides
Peter GORDON, James MOORE, Harry RICHARDSON, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA
Discussion Paper 2008-22
-
Toward Risk-Based Aviation Security Policy --
Slides
Robert POOLE, Reason Foundation, Los Angeles, USA
Discussion Paper 2008-23
-
Summary and Conclusions
- The Cost and Effectiveness of Policies to Reduce Vehicle Emissions
31 January- 1 February 2008
- Oil Dependence: Is Transport Running out
of Affordable Fuel?
Paris, 15-16 November 2007
- Macro-, Meso- and Micro-Infrastructure Planning and
Assessment Tools.
Regional Round Table, Boston, USA, 25-26 October 2007
- Discussion Papers 2007-8 to 2007-14
-
Outline
-
Participants
-
Recent Evolution of Research into the Wider Economic Benefits of Transport
Infrastructure Investments
Roger VICKERMAN, Centre for European, Regional and Transport Economics, University of Kent, UK
-
The Broader Benefits of Transportation Infrastructure
Ian SUE WING, William ANDERSON, and T.R. LAKSHMANAN, Boston University, USA
-
Transport Infrastructure Inside and Across Urban Regions
Börje JOHANSSON, Jönköping International Business School, Sweden
-
Agglomeration Economies and Transport Infrastructure
Dr. Dan GRAHAM, Imperial College London, UK
-
Wider Economic Benefits of Investments in Transport Infrastructure
Prof. Jeffrey COHEN, University of Hartford, USA
-
Application of Economic Analysis for Transport Decision Making
Glen WEISBROD and Brian Baird ALSTADT, Economic Development Research Group Inc., Boston, USA
- Biofuels: Linking Support to Performance
Paris, 7-8 June 2007
|